IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate web”

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by lloydatkinson on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @04:10AM (#26953330)

Nothing says "indie" like all your websites apparently needing to be using wikipedia's wiki software I guess? At least that's what is indicated by clicking the getting started. I share the same confusion as the other commenters.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by epeus on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @07:12AM (#26954399)

For an action oriented list, try https://indiewebify.me/

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by gloriousternary on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @04:14PM (#26960928)

If the Wikimedia Foundation stopped development or decided they didn't like indieweb, it wouldn't affect this site; worst-case scenario, they could just move to something else. That independence is the point of indieweb, not to specifically avoid software from other people or corporations.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by lloydatkinson on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @09:26AM (#26955507)

Looks like I made the creators mad for pointing out their docs suck

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by aaronpk on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @11:23AM (#26957165)

No it was just a bad take

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:IndieWeb: A people-focused alternative to the “corporate ... by lloydatkinson on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @04:57PM (#26961448)

Yeah, who wants websites to explain themselves? /s

[ Parent | on HN ]