Re:Supreme Court to Decide First-Ever Gun-Carry Case
by Grakel on Monday April 26, 2021 @09:50PM
(#26950885)
Consider the war on drugs- not just a complete failure, but actively harmful, especially to minority communities, while rich white users continue about their business largely unmolested. You can get anything you want your first time in a visit to any American city inside of an hour. Just stop by a restaurant kitchen. Banning firearms would be about as successful. So the argument is, why criminalize a huge number of people who aren't criminals just because some criminals and mentally ill people use guns? It would lead to another drug war situation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court to Decide First-Ever Gun-Carry Case
by agogdog on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @01:55AM
(#26952499)
So I guess if you swing it the other way, the popular rhetoric around drugs is that they'd be better off legal and heavily regulated.
Pro-drug proponents are all for this. Why are pro-gun proponents against more regulation, especially lobbyists?
Re:Supreme Court to Decide First-Ever Gun-Carry Case
by dariusj18 on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @10:19AM
(#26956193)
Regulation is a broad term for this context. I'm sure pro-gun proponents would be more than happy if the government regulated for product safety and quality and are generally fine with age limits and restricting sales to licensed dealers.