‘Contextualization Engines’ can fight misinformation without censorship

Re:‘Contextualization Engines’ can fight misinformation with... by BitwiseFool on Monday April 26, 2021 @03:59PM (#26947277)

Everyone needs to pick and choose which information/disinformation battles they want to take part in. Flat-Earthers, Chemtrail People, Moonlanding Hoaxers, these people aren't really worth anyone's time. How does someone else believing the world is flat impinge on your ability to live your life?

Now, I can understand wanting to combat vaccine hesitancy because that does tangibly affect society at-large (recent measles outbreaks). But most of the disinformation boogeymen you listed are just people with kooky ideas who aren't persuading society.

Lastly, it's okay to be wrong about things. The body of human knowledge is so vast that everyone is bound to be more wrong than right.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:‘Contextualization Engines’ can fight misinformation with... by toss1 on Monday April 26, 2021 @04:16PM (#26947495)

There is a difference between 1) simply being wrong by mistake vs 2) deliberate and maintained ignorance vs. 3) deliberately deceiving people and poisoning the agora.

Mere ordinary wrongness is a big enough problem. And to the degree that it is mere cultural ignorance, it can be merely annoying.

But intentionally spreading disinformation, fear porn, and cultivating false outrage to inflame divisions in society is much more serious, and should not be conflated with mere buffoonery.

[ Parent | on HN ]