Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by philwelch on Sunday April 25, 2021 @11:52PM
(#26939098)
I thought you just tied the zeppelin down. Couldn’t you reduce the amount of helium in them?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by ahelwer on Monday April 26, 2021 @06:29AM
(#26941077)
Pumping helium in & out of a zeppelin would be even more complicated than pumping water.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by philwelch on Monday April 26, 2021 @12:34PM
(#26944523)
Or you could load a heavier material for ballast, and gradually transform it into a lead zeppelin.
But seriously, why can’t you just tie the zeppelin down? Is there not any sort of cable material with enough tensile strength?
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by ahelwer on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @11:09AM
(#26956954)
Hmmm, running some rough calculations the passenger load probably wouldn't exceed about 50 tons for 500 people. Which is very doable to do with a tether. So maybe you're right! Solar-powered passenger airships could be the future. It's cargo airships I'm thinking of that really have these drawbacks.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ...
by philwelch on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @05:16PM
(#26961677)
And for a cargo zeppelin, swapping out full shipping containers for weighted ballast shipping containers seems pretty easy. Though I seriously doubt cargo zeppelins make any sense at all.