News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by nn3 on Sunday April 25, 2021 @04:25PM (#26936340)
That assumes that you don't need to drive?

10 hours of active driving is something completely different than 20 hours being a passenger/sightseer (of which I would spend significant part asleep or reading) In fact I don't think it's safe to drive for 10 hours, you probably need to add several hours of rest, and will still be half zombie after that.

At some point the train becomes attractive. It's certainly a much less stressful option.

That said I must agree American trains are in poor shape compared to other places.

Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by harambae on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @08:45AM (#26955111)
>10 hours of active driving

Well-marked, well-maintained, well-signed, and gradient/curve controlled interstate highways are among the easiest for self-driving vehicles. It's just about possible today (but expensive and in some ways legally unsolved).

It would be shocking if America didn't have popular, reasonably-priced self-driving highway vehicles in 14 years to do that (14 years used to match the timeline of Amtrak's 2035 map).

Re:Amtrak's 2035 map has people talking about the future of ... by brudgers on Sunday April 25, 2021 @07:06PM (#26937570)
So take the bus.