Re:Volkswagen launches its first all-electric SUV, the ID.4
by osigurdson on Saturday April 24, 2021 @12:14AM
(#26922202)
Why such concern about people owning things that they may not truly need? I'd say it is a bit of a slippery slope. Many things are not truly needed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Volkswagen launches its first all-electric SUV, the ID.4
by Pxtl on Saturday April 24, 2021 @12:36AM
(#26922269)
Large utility vehicles like pickups are, by dint of their mass, their high centres, and their poorer visibility, dangerous to other people on the road.
They also release a large amount of carbon into the air.
So yes, their use as a recreational or status symbol should be discouraged.
Re:Volkswagen launches its first all-electric SUV, the ID.4
by kevin_thibedeau on Saturday April 24, 2021 @01:04AM
(#26922384)
I have an older Ford Ranger. It is only 300 lbs heavier than the heaviest Prius models. Put a pair of super sized Americans in there and their gross weight is more than my dangerously heavy vehicle.
Re:Volkswagen launches its first all-electric SUV, the ID.4
by djrobstep on Saturday April 24, 2021 @12:34AM
(#26922263)
A slippery slope to what? Cutting down on pointless consumption and needless environmental damage?
Re:Volkswagen launches its first all-electric SUV, the ID.4
by osigurdson on Monday April 26, 2021 @03:38AM
(#26940232)
My point is the discussion should be entirely about carbon footprint, not whether CO2 emitting processes or machines (in this case large vehicles) are truly "needed".