To me, this is just a tired hot take. The Daily Mail regularly covers stories that others don’t, and they do so with perspectives and plain speak that others don’t provide. I feel like everyone here attacking the Daily Mail doesn’t actually read them, but are blindly repeating an opinion they’ve been told to hold, because the Daily Mail’s existence is inconvenient for other newspapers and for certain ideologies. It’s tactically easier to attack the source rather than individual pieces of content. We see the same thing with the N.Y. Post.

During these polarized times when censorship is rampant and diverse perspectives are hard to come by, I’m glad to have someone like the Daily Mail around. A recent example of a great article is their story on COVID vaccines potentially affecting menstruation (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-9446907/Some-wome...), which they wrote about before any other major news media. Read for yourself and decide how you feel about the content.