Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3
by cevian on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @11:27AM
(#26890924)
That's fair but I was more replying to the OP that said "but it shouldn't be called an Open Source license". The point is we don't call our license Open Source.
Comparisons to Open Source and discussions of the pros and cons of both approaches are, of course, fair.
There were also no claims about whatever definition of restrictive you were using. It was just a short statement that the Timescale license was designed to be less restrictive than the AGPL. You can't really be that surprised when somebody comes along and starts judging it by Open Source standards after that, can you?