News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3 by foerbert on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @11:27PM (#26885113)
That's fine. I wasn't taking a position. I was explaining why people were using Open Source as a comparison.

There were also no claims about whatever definition of restrictive you were using. It was just a short statement that the Timescale license was designed to be less restrictive than the AGPL. You can't really be that surprised when somebody comes along and starts judging it by Open Source standards after that, can you?

Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3 by cevian on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @11:27AM (#26890924)
That's fair but I was more replying to the OP that said "but it shouldn't be called an Open Source license". The point is we don't call our license Open Source.

Comparisons to Open Source and discussions of the pros and cons of both approaches are, of course, fair.