Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3
by BoysenberryPi on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @04:05PM
(#26880774)
Frankly I'd be surprised if Kubernetes wasn't dead in 20 years.
Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3
by ethbr0 on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @04:09PM
(#26880846)
Imho, K8s eventually evolves into an OS for running K8s, then gets productized on {non-x86-64}
Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3
by edoceo on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @05:15PM
(#26881794)
not looking forward to the k8s-arm-soc enabled bootloader (tightly integrated to systemd of course) to run k8s-os to run k8s-system to run docker.
Re:Grafana, Loki, and Tempo will be relicensed to AGPLv3
by gen220 on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @05:53PM
(#26882319)
It’s just my opinion and I’ll be happy to be wrong (because it means something better will have supplanted it).
But I don’t think there’s a significantly-simpler, mature abstraction for doing container orchestration, than K8s.
K8s’ main advantage/stickiness factor, is how abstract and modular it is. It’s an opinionated Kernel that gets most things right and has a huge ecosystem of tools built around this kernel.
It has a very similar set of stickiness factors to Linux, imo, although the origin story couldn’t be more different of course.
I think if anything replaces K8s, it’ll take a Linux-like shape. But K8s gets enough things correct (licensing, api, modularity) that it’ll be hard to replace it wholesale.
What leads you to say that? I wouldn't be surprised if kubernetes is dead in 20 years. I would be very surprised if google is dead in 20 years.