Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by js8 on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @01:55AM
(#26871140)
It already exists in the IBM mainframe. But nobody wants to write apps for it..
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by ironicsonic on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @03:45AM
(#26871818)
Who would want to use those weird, outdated languages and technologies, though?
It's better to use a modern DevOps stack involving Kubernetes, Ansible, YAML, Jinja2, Python, cron jobs, regexes, shell scripts, JSON, Jenkinsfiles, Dockerfiles, etc.
Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by marcosdumay on Tuesday April 20, 2021 @09:55AM
(#26874713)
Yep. At this time it wouldn't be great to just imitate the best mainframes compartmentalization, because we have much better experimental systems. But they are still much better than anything common on commodity hardware.
Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by selfhoster11 on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @07:44AM
(#26888306)
Likely because IBM mainframes are outside of the reach of hobbyists and SMEs.
Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by mikewarot on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @09:53PM
(#26897830)
No, it's because the "capabilities" built into mainframes aren't accessible by users, only the system administrators. The granularity just isn't there.
Re:Software Infrastructure 2.0: A Wishlist
by selfhoster11 on Friday April 23, 2021 @05:47AM
(#26912875)
That too. But I'd argue that not being able to access or set up a mainframe due to its unaffordability or esotericism is a much more powerful barrier, that makes granularity a moot point.