Re:Why has no one made a better Goodreads
by billfruit on Friday April 16, 2021 @11:43AM
(#26835275)
It is broken in certain aspects, Goodreads is one of the slowest sites around, if nothing else is done that alone needs fixing. And it has been in this state for years now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why has no one made a better Goodreads
by jacobsenscott on Friday April 16, 2021 @01:00PM
(#26836396)
I don't actually use good reads, but I clicked around - everything I clicked on loaded faster (less than 2 seconds, usually less than 1) than everything I clicked on in medium (always more than 2 seconds, where this blog post is hosted).
Neither site is fast, but "one of the slowest around" doesn't track either.
Re:Why has no one made a better Goodreads
by davidwparker on Friday April 16, 2021 @02:56PM
(#26837702)
I think it may be more so for logged in users. When logged in, and I go to the homepage, which is essentially an activity feed, it has 93 requests, 4.4MB of resources (1.5MB transferred), and took 7.66 seconds to finish.
In my experience, Goodreads loads slower on a phone than on a desktop browser (and it's only the initial load that I notice being slow). I've long suspected (without evidence) that this is intentional because they nerf the mobile web experience in an attempt to get you to use their app.
Re:Why has no one made a better Goodreads
by FalconSensei on Friday April 16, 2021 @06:49PM
(#26839897)
I don't use their mobile site, but the android app works really well, and looks great.