That is some pretty non-transitional thinking!
Why in the world would a man not be able to just a Redis project developed by a woman?
[edited because of your edit: I stand by the above statement even in the face of your very weak argument]
Let me ask you a question. If that panel had been all women, would you be on here talking about how a woman would not be able to judge a Redis project developed by a man?
I didn't choose. Perhaps the people that did, didn't have a lot of, or maybe any, women to choose from? Or perhaps, and I know this is going to piss off a lot of people, but perhaps the best judges they could find just happened to be men?
In any case, my mind, unlike yours apparently, did not immediately jump to malice or the soft bigotry of them "just not knowing" they fucked up due to innate misogyny.
I am pretty sure, if you were selected, no matter how good other products will be, you chose female build product. Is this fair?
e.g maybe they were the only competent/(interested in taking a part in this project) people avaliable
No one said women are incompetent, this is how you build your own world view, so you think men think women are incompetent.
I am not a fan of discrimination, "positive" or otherwise, but I think acknowledging that unconscious biases exist, and that a panel selection process has tried to account for that, is the minimum I'd expect for something like this.
The commenter above literally says "maybe [men] were the only competent people avaliable".
For clarification, are we reading this differently?
"maybe [men] were the only competent people avaliable"
is not equal to
"women are incompetent"
e.g let's say you have 10 senior level men because they were in the company since the beginning and then you have let's say 40-60% women-men ratio in new people - juniors and mid levels
If I were company, then I'd send the best people avalibale to things like that, also some people just may not want to do things like that
The assumption being made in this thread is that the six men are particular experts in the fields being judged: the best available experts.
From what I can see, the selected judges don't even work in those fields being judged (i.e. there is no reason to confer them this expertise), so the reasoning that the best available experts must have been chosen doesn't make any sense.
It's a specific technology in a coding environment where 95% seems to be male. I don't know 1 female dba, which is more closely aligned than what Redis does ( I do know multiple in design/UX/Graphics )
Open source even has more males to females than tech in general.
You are free to find better data than the Github survey: https://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/#data which clearly states that only 1/20 are female.
Additionally: 9 people in Redis org, all male: https://github.com/orgs/redis/people
Additionally: I can't see a single female Redis contributor: https://github.com/redis/redis/graphs/contributors
They have female employees outside of coding, for sure: https://redislabs.com/company/careers/
Convince me with relevant data that the judge panel is "unfair".
Please check the parent link for the "Judging Criteria" section (two of the three strands are Usefulness and UX) and "Project Ideas" section (literally all product designs).
UX and DX ( you removed halve), it can be an API. An API doesn't need design or UX.
There's not a single absolute requirement on design.
Since product design/ux is about graphics/visuals.
Sure, that's what I would do. But that part is up to them.
Why person in his/her right mind should look at person's sex/race/religion when judging product?
P.S. I am not against diversity, everyone should have equal opportunity, but people should not be forced to be engineers. This kind of messages are freaking me out recently
Female and male are different in some aspects of their biology, no matter what you say, they are different anyway. This difference tends to affect people choice. And 90% woman in Norway choose to be nurse.
We should strive to have an equal opportunity for everyone (race/gender doesn't matter, just equal opportunity), not push people to become what they don't want
what if their design is more girlish in style and men wouldnt get it?
Discussions about biases that purely stem from modern synthetic biases merely created by social movements for the sake of recognition are an interesting topic. Bias-ception maybe?
Perhaps there is an overrepresentation of males, because there are more males that contribute/work in IT?
Eg. First page of people in .net contains 1 female and 19 males: https://github.com/orgs/dotnet/people
Too bad some people don't accept facts anymore. They should fix the root causes, eg. make coding for women more popular.
[Edited for downvoters: this is important because of natural biases in human judging, it serves as an automatic warning to women and other genders that they are unlikely to be treated fairly and suggests to them that they shouldn't bother to participate.
If you can't be bothered to find a single woman judge, how are you going to rate projects created and designed by or for women?]