Re:WhatsApp's new privacy policy is so bad it might be illegal
by noja on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @06:30AM
(#26805155)
> trust only works in retrospect
Nonsense. Trust provides a basis for present and future dealings.
Re:WhatsApp's new privacy policy is so bad it might be illegal
by DyslexicAtheist on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @06:32AM
(#26805174)
please get in touch by email, I have a business proposal for you.
I highly recommend Robert Cialdini before making opinionated comments on trust: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influence:_Science_and_Practic...
Re:WhatsApp's new privacy policy is so bad it might be illegal
by user-the-name on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @07:35AM
(#26805642)
No, because, and this is very crucial:
I don't trust you.
Re:WhatsApp's new privacy policy is so bad it might be illegal
by DyslexicAtheist on Wednesday April 14, 2021 @10:02AM
(#26807194)
sounds like you did not understand that this was rhetorical?
Re:WhatsApp's new privacy policy is so bad it might be illegal
by user-the-name on Friday April 16, 2021 @04:54AM
(#26831340)
I understood that perfectly, and I pointed out to you that your rhetorical argument is invalid.
trust only works in retrospect (it can't be extended into the future to a party simply because they make a promise)
all such relationships have an expiry date (since as the trusted party evolves or needs to reinvent itself to satisfy shareholders). what can prevent this are bullet-proof contracts (that's not how people make decisions though - they never read the fine-print, review it when it changes and instead work on gut-feeling and emotions).
putting your trust into a brand/product is always going to eventually hurt you. A product having reached the size of Signal will most certainly throw part of it's user-base to the curb if it thinks it's held back by their opinions/goals.
The disconnect is people thinking Signal owes them something (when everybody actually used it for free until now).