Re:Is content moderation a dead end?
by Etheryte on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @02:47PM
(#26797150)
Au contraire, I'd argue HN is a very diverse site but it's the moderation by both users and moderators that makes it seem orderly and uniform. There are many stories that get flagged a-la blogspam, low quality, clickbait etc, and same with comments. Those that don't have merit by the community don't reach the wider audience. I think the conception that HN is uniform is a somewhat common misunderstanding, as evidenced by discussions on supposedly-trolls and the like: it isn't usually the case that someone is shilling or trolling, more often than not it's just someone with a different world view.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
I think HN moderation works because it is relatively obscure and several orders of magnitude smaller than FB/Twitter/etc. I wonder long do it would take for HN to be completely overwhelmed if a large subreddit decided to come in and start trolling/spamming?
There are very few meaning of word diverse that HN conforms to. Education, profession, gender, hobbies, location, all tend to be from one cluster.
Re:Is content moderation a dead end?
by nullserver on Tuesday April 13, 2021 @03:03PM
(#26797405)
HN is very heavy on Academics / Developers / Engineers.
Very different demographics then world at large.