I continue to hear this yet I never get a _single_ convincing example from DeFi advocates.
If it can help you imagine some, take the decentralized primitives: a money/value transfer network, a reputation network, a content delivery network.
Starting from those, many currently gimped online services could be replicated in a way that incentivizes behaviors which benefit users, more than the platform owner. Local economies that currently function only through local, unscalable networks of trust could be brought online.
Of course, if you believe everything is better done in a way that can be regulated by a central entity, then crypto as it stands won't do anything for you (although public ledgers do make investigations easier). Core to crypto is a belief that P2P networks are superior to centrally managed ones.
Moreover, trust isn't something mediated by computers. Trust is a question of human societies. Algorithmic trust is not arbiter of trust any more than the thousands of electronic trust schemes, which get gamed at some point or another and where human intervention is necessary for course correction given a measure of authority.
Computer systems aren't outside of human law or common principles of human trust or institutions. BTC and all those other networks are just as if not more vulnerable to being gamed as any other system.
Yes, indeed. That's enough to be useful, they don't need to be better at everything.
> Moreover, trust isn't something mediated by computers. Trust is a question of human societies. Algorithmic trust is not arbiter of trust any more than the thousands of electronic trust schemes, which get gamed at some point or another and where human intervention is necessary for course correction given a measure of authority.
Yes, and P2P/F2F systems allow more human input in networks. Individuals are free to decide with whom to interact or not. This is more humane than letting a blackbox ML model be the arbiter of truth, decide who is a fraudster and should have their account frozen (Paypal), decide who should be silenced (Twitter), ...
> BTC and all those other networks are just as if not more vulnerable to being gamed as any other system.
Great, there's a $1 trillion bounty for when you decide to start gaming BTC.
This. And maybe also that "automatic" processing (enabled by maths) is more efficient and solid than human beings, especially when it relates to trust.
Any "anti-cryptocurrencies" stance has IMHO to state why cryptocurrencies affect him/her author, or anybody else. Stating that it is useless is just an opinion. Many things are judged "useless" by many, let's for example take "billiard": there is AFAIK no solid and widely accepted "anti-billiard" stance. If there is no harm, there is no reason to ban.
Now obviously this is not quite a a reality today. Most things exchanged on Uniswap are crypto tokens, but there are a lot of synthetic assets today, like mTSLA (which is a synthetic share of TSLA) and many more. So now I can hold stocks in my Metamask account today. Sure, it's only price exposure, it's not like TSLA has dividends anyway.
And then there's the oracle problem when it comes to real world assets, but this is solvable with existing legal systems, and soon, crypto legal systems like OpenLaw.
So yeah, Uniswap is my go to example of the power of DeFi.
I'm not sure what world you live in where the biggest problem with buying a six-figure investment instruments is that _I can't do it from my browser_.
There's about a thousand things more important in my mind when it comes to investing. For a day trader this might be a problem. For decades-long instruments it isn't.
All the things you mention have issues that go beyond a browser. You could log on to a real estate page and buy a house and that's technically possible, and digital token doesn't do a damn to improve the experience.
I am a thousand times more likely to run into legal permits issues, KYC and anti-money laundering forms, getting stuck reading contractual obligations that certain assets require, etc.
But it's so much more than that. Have a little imagination. Digital assets could very well be the dominant forms of assets in the future, so easy access to markets to trade these is important.
You just disagree that this has importance, but the market says otherwise, since people are very interested in using Uniswap, and volume will only grow from here. It's undeniable that this is a usecase, and I remember only a couple of years ago that HN would say that Ethereum is completely useless, and yet here we are.
1. While this is technically become realer and realer every day, it's becoming less and less logistically due to regulation.
2. Eventually people will realize that the frictionless experience of crypto is also its greatest security risk[0]. Why do you think the Winklevoss twins store their wallet backup codes in...you guessed it...BANKS! ha.[1]
The Winklevosses came up with an elaborate system to store and secure their own private keys. They cut up printouts of their private keys into pieces and then distributed them in envelopes to safe deposit boxes around the country, so if one envelope were stolen the thief would not have the entire key.
[0] - https://gist.github.com/chitchcock/1281611
[1] - https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/19/technology/bitcoin-winkle...
This may be a relatively lawless environment, but as for its current atmosphere, blame the world's central banks, not the crypto builders who are mostly as disgusted by the current situation as sidelined observers.
Decentralized networks have the potential to resolve many of the issues we techies love to complain about. Only a tiny percentage of that $2 trillion is allocated to teams actually working on solving these issues (Binance and Coinbase definitely aren't a part of it), so please try to reserve your judgment when you see developments coming out of crypto. Most of it is under-developed, over-hyped, and just an extension of the tech-bubble ponzi, but some of it will actually change the world. In the same way Tesla is actually positive to society overall and we shouldn't shun their cars just because the company's stock is a meme used in zero-sum-game gambling.