Re:Technologies I thought my son would never use
by michaelmrose on Sunday April 11, 2021 @04:31PM
(#26773126)
I think you can argue that its not true for things in which item A and item B are members of a broader class of things wherein changing from A -> B incurs no or trivial costs or little fundamental changes in fulfilling the purpose of the class of items and there exists no immediate need to stop using A.
For example nobody expects the 2004 Toyota Carolla to be forever but the gas powered car will be far harder to kill.
For example nobody expects the 2004 Toyota Carolla to be forever but the gas powered car will be far harder to kill.