News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading by throw0101a on Saturday April 10, 2021 @05:20PM (#26765229)
> The Medallion fund is a whole other kettle of fish.

It should be noted that while markets may be mostly efficient, I do not think anyone is claiming they are completely efficient.

If there are price discrepancies/anomalies, they could be exploited, at least some of the time. It could be that Medallion can find some and exploit them, say, 55% of the time. But over a large volume of transactions.

Casinos make huge profits by exploit small house edges in volume:

* https://wizardofodds.com/gambling/house-edge/

There's a reason why Medallion has been closed for years: the (possible) market inefficiency exploits they're using may not scale.

Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading by JessicaBosworth on Wednesday April 21, 2021 @12:57AM (#26885579)
The tax burden always puts pressure on any man in the street, and even more so on every businessman, and now a new financial year is already underway, and business processes remain at the level of last year, therefore, it is necessary to further intensify the working moments for successful work. Of course, now the purchasing power has slightly decreased, and in general they are buying fewer goods, but all the same, the turnover will soon increase and everything should return to normal, and then, finally, the time for entertainment and online casino games https://jennycasino.com/ where you can play with great interest.
Re:“Buy and Hold” No More: The Resurgence of Active Trading by baobabKoodaa on Saturday April 10, 2021 @05:52PM (#26765476)
> It should be noted that while markets may be mostly efficient, I do not think anyone is claiming they are completely efficient.

This is false. Grandparent is specifically claiming that markets are completely efficient. Here is a direct quote: "Whether you're an individual trader or a billionaire hedge fund manager, active strategies lose out to passive ones in the long run."

In addition, many academics are also making this same ludicrous claim.