News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Against Alcohol by CarelessExpert on Saturday April 10, 2021 @03:25PM (#26764274)
> but a vast percentage of people are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction.

Sorry, you're gonna have to back up this rather hefty statement with some facts. I've never seen any data to suggest that a "vast percentage" of people are at risk of becoming alcoholics.

Re:Against Alcohol by johnorourke on Saturday April 10, 2021 @03:56PM (#26764549)
> gonna have to back up this rather hefty statement

Thanks, you're quite right to challenge that, it's a belief based on past reading and should be backed up.

Re:Against Alcohol by rhapsodic on Saturday April 10, 2021 @04:02PM (#26764604)
>> but a vast percentage of people are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction.

> Sorry, you're gonna have to back up this rather hefty statement with some facts. I've never seen any data to suggest that a "vast percentage" of people are at risk of becoming alcoholics.

"vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction" and "at risk of becoming alcoholics" are not the same thing. A person might refrain from alcohol altogether because they believe, perhaps due to their family history, that if they drank on a regular basis they would become alcoholic. IOW, they feel they are vulnerable to the gradual creep of addiction. And they might be right. But as long they don't drink at all, they're not at risk of developing alcoholism.

Re:Against Alcohol by CarelessExpert on Saturday April 10, 2021 @05:16PM (#26765194)
The claim was a "vast percentage of people are vulnerable" to alcoholism. Their reply supports my interpretation of their comment.

This isn't about the propensity of an individual to develop alcoholism based on personal circumstances. This is a population-level claim with no data to back it up.

Frankly, I'm not even sure what you're arguing but it seems wholly disconnected from the OPs claim or my counterpoint.