Re:Setting up Starlink
by walrus01 on Saturday April 10, 2021 @12:16PM
(#26762562)
no, I've had a beta terminal for months, upstream averages 15-18 Mbps with brief bursts to 30.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Setting up Starlink
by spookthesunset on Saturday April 10, 2021 @12:19PM
(#26762595)
15-30mbps is about what I get for my upstream “gigabit” cable service.
that's typical on DOCSIS3 cable since they intentionally allocate and bond a much greater number of channels for downstream capacity, to match the usage patterns of hundreds of users in aggregate. The actual amount of RF available for upstream is quite small in a typical configuration.
You can get a modem with 32 down and 8 up channels. 8 up channels can support over 200 Mbps. But Comcast will still limit you to 5-10 Mbps.
Then there's DOCSIS 3.1, which actually supports up to 1 Gbit/s up, but Comcast still only gives you 35 Mbps on their gigabit plan.
IMO it just comes down to Comcast and other cable providers being cheap and not investing in their infrastructure to provide better upload speeds, even though the tech itself is capable of it.
Nearly all cable networks use a low split, cutting off around 42Mhz for upstream bandwidth. Not all bandwidth from 0 to 42Mhz is usable due to external interference, most cable systems are able to get 4 full sized 8Mhz Docsis 3.0 channels into this space and one partial channel of 3 to 4Mhz.
Certain ISPs like Cox have started using OFDMA (Docsis 3.1) upstream channels as it is 50% more efficient than classic Docsis channels and you can operate it closer to spectrum with interference since it can run subchannels at lower modulation
just because the modem is capable of 8 channels up does not mean that it's likely your local segment to the CMTS is configured that way.
Re:Setting up Starlink
by GoOnThenDoTell on Saturday April 10, 2021 @03:14PM
(#26764182)
I hope they can change that, we all need more upload these days working at home