https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
If other comments are mistaken, the thing to do is respectfully provide correct information, so we all learn. Putting others down, posing superciliously, and so on only adds noise and evokes worse from others.
https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&sor...
2) Shouldn’t matter. Their platform, their choice (and if you disagree because they’re a monopoly, you can’t just not pay them without consequences, the court has to handle those things). You could also say that all the money they’ve spent to make Android a de facto world standard that can benefit you as a developer is what you’re paying for.
Windows phone tried plenty to sway developers, so it's that would have worked. It would have been the money incentives Microsoft did, since it was part of it's marketing.
Not because they actually swayed developers.
Because app developers have no choice but to accept Google's rules if they want anyone using their app. Do you really want to give Google unlimited, unilateral power over a whole business sector here?
The distribution costs may be minute in the case of this developers app if it’s only downloaded a few thousand times a month, but they exist. And in the case of something like Spotify it’s likely Petabytes a month of bandwidth.
So while it's true that there is a financial cost to Google for hosting your app, there's also a financial gain in the sense that the presence of your app contributes to the popularity/viability of their platform.
https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2020/09/listening-...
But I don't think that distinction makes much difference.
Breach of contract is not one. It's not even a tort. An EULA has no legal value, despite what Google would love you to believe.