News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The patent troll that won a $308M jury trial against Apple. Parent comment

Re:The patent troll that won a $308M jury trial against Apple by cycomanic on Saturday April 10, 2021 @10:46AM (#26761860)
Can we do away with this myth that patenting something will somehow put knowledge into the open. Has anyone here actually read a patent? They absolutely will not tell you how to do something. In particular I know for fact that, the things that are actually valuable are either never patented or specifically omitted from the patents so that no one can actually reproduce a method technology from a patent because some crucial steps are missing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The patent troll that won a $308M jury trial against Apple by unishark on Saturday April 10, 2021 @12:31PM (#26762697)
> Can we do away with this myth that patenting something will somehow put knowledge into the open.

They said it's the purpose of the patent system, not the real-world effect. It's very important to remind people of this purpose. Because people (especially lawyers) keep pushing this concept that ownership on a patented idea is some kind of natural right being protected by law. Which is completely opposite to reality, and part of what leads to the system being warped in the way you complain about.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The patent troll that won a $308M jury trial against Apple by varjag on Saturday April 10, 2021 @11:03AM (#26761957)
That's not the rule, patents have to be reproducible by a man of the trade. Not disclosing crucial steps in the claims, even if overlooked by an examiner, is also a handicap: someone can circumvent your patent if the actual substance is missing.

Have a look at the original Gore membrane patent: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4194041A/en

It's very clear, detailed and reproducible.

And since we are on HN, here a bit on the software side: IBM original arithmetic coding patent.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US4905297A/en

Perhaps it something that should not have been patented, but it's fully disclosed and reproducible.

[ Parent | on HN ]