News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon workers vote against unionizing in Alabama by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Friday April 09, 2021 @02:57PM (#26754590)
It's complicated. When you're the only game in town you enter an ethical gray area where the community is your hostage. Things seem alright now but what happens when the mines run dry?
Re:Amazon workers vote against unionizing in Alabama by yocheckitdawg on Friday April 09, 2021 @08:24PM (#26757793)
What a ridiculous way of looking at it. Companies are damned if they do, damned if they don't in the eyes of some, just by the very fact that they are a private entity motivated to make a profit.

Nevermind the fact that from my eyes looking at America from overseas, it seems like companies are the only institutions/organisations that are functioning even remotely in a socially optimal way.

Your government is a disaster and couldn't meaningfully manage the pandemic at all, academia is a disaster and is bankrupting your future, military is a disaster and has heavily underinvested in next generation weapons programs so they could spend more time bombing the middle East, your unions are self-serving enterprises (aren't schools in your most populous state STILL closed due to teacher's unions?), your newspaper are incredibly corrupt across the spectrum.

The only things that seem to work correctly are your companies which are still world-leading and world class. Amazon is a gem in your society, but demonised as if it is the source of all problems.

Re:Amazon workers vote against unionizing in Alabama by sergefaguet on Sunday April 11, 2021 @04:31AM (#26768578)
Excellent comment
Re:Amazon workers vote against unionizing in Alabama by astrange on Friday April 09, 2021 @07:26PM (#26757415)
Is Amazon a monopsony employer in this town? It sounds like they aren't since their warehouse created 1500 jobs and the population is 27000.
Re:Amazon workers vote against unionizing in Alabama by akiselev on Friday April 09, 2021 @07:55PM (#26757587)
Assuming 60% of the population is employed (roughly more than the US average), that's just under a tenth of the workforce of 16k. Assuming 50% of the workforce is employed by small businesses (slightly more than national average), that makes them a fifth of all people employed by companies large enough to afford to really push local politics around. It's enough numbers to swing most controversial issues

It's not company town level of influence, though. A defining feature of which IIRC is that the company owned most or all other businesses in the town and often extracted most of the workers wage through extortionate pricing of basic goods and services.