Re:Food waste responsible for 10% of global emissions?
by VBprogrammer on Friday April 09, 2021 @08:40AM
(#26749775)
Of course marginal land which is left untouched has no monetary or food value. What is the value of the difference between grazed and ungrazed? Is it enough to justify paying people to leave it fallow?
Re:Food waste responsible for 10% of global emissions?
by adrianN on Friday April 09, 2021 @08:13AM
(#26749507)
That is interesting. Do you have a link to that research?
Re:Food waste responsible for 10% of global emissions?
by shafyy on Friday April 09, 2021 @05:18PM
(#26756312)
Here's a good study on carbon opportunity cost of land: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41893-020-00603-4.epdf?shar...
It's always better plant and eat the food directly than to feed it to an animal.
Of course, if you're in a scenario where you live on a small island with no connection to the outside world, and you only have marginal land, yes, you need might need to have livestock to survive. But that's not what we're talking about here.