Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by KptMarchewa on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:41AM
(#26722937)
Strongly disagree - COBOL apps are strongly tied to their obsolete hardware. On the other hand, containerized applications are "portable" - can run on everything that runs Linux.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by webreac on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:53AM
(#26723503)
As someone who has worked on migration project from redhat 6 to redhat 7, I strongly disagree.
Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by mrweasel on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @11:21AM
(#26726200)
The article speculates that the hardware is “no more” than 16 years old. Obsolete, but newer than the original code, meaning that it not that strongly tied to the hardware.
Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by adamcstephens on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:21AM
(#26723240)
COBOL can and does run on x86 Linux. I suppose you could probably even put it in a container.
Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by KptMarchewa on Thursday April 08, 2021 @08:05PM
(#26745290)
It can, but do you really believe is this what those apps are working on, or even that they could work without major rewrite? They are strongly tied to their mainframe environments.
Re:An Apology to COBOL: Maybe Old Technology Isn’t the Real ...
by toomanybeersies on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @10:58AM
(#26725880)
From Big Blue itself, COBOL on a Kubernetes cluster!