Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by jandrese on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @01:28PM
(#26714775)
I found it a little weird that they conclusions section didn't mention the AMD or ARM competition at all, given that the Intel chip seemed to be behind them in most of the tests.
Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by jvanderbot on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @01:38PM
(#26714915)
You mean OP didn't? Yes, that's probably standard PR to focus on strengths rather than competition.
Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by jandrese on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @02:21PM
(#26715430)
I mean the Anand piece.
Re:Intel 3rd gen Xeon Scalable (Ice Lake): generationally bi...
by jvanderbot on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @02:41PM
(#26715652)
The conclusions section was quoted in my post and they explicitly mention it.
"As impressive as the new Xeon 8380 is from a generational and technical stand-point, what really matters at the end of the day is how it fares up to the competition. I’ll be blunt here; nobody really expected the new ICL-SP parts to beat AMD or the new Arm competition – and it didn’t. "
"At the end of the day, Ice Lake SP is a success. Performance is up, and performance per watt is up. I'm sure if we were able to test Intel's acceleration enhancements more thoroughly, we would be able to corroborate some of the results and hype that Intel wants to generate around its product. But even as a success, it’s not a traditional competitive success. The generational improvements are there and they are large, and as long as Intel is the market share leader, this should translate into upgraded systems and deployments throughout the enterprise industry. Intel is still in a tough competitive situation overall with the high quality the rest of the market is enabling."