News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by lm28469 on Monday April 05, 2021 @03:03PM (#26703169)
> Many Uber drivers barely make minimum wage.

Because they're legally allowed to be underpaid contractors. The law should be changed to fix the root cause, not to change this side effect. Uber drivers aren't barely making min wage because they have no incentives to pick up disabled people ...

Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by syshum on Monday April 05, 2021 @07:18PM (#26705912)
By "fix the root cause" you mean shut down uber right? because if all the "solutions" I have seen just in this thread were required (everything from Uber outfitting every car with Hypoallergenic compartments, to paying drivers extra for different types of customers (with out charging extra to the customer ofcourse) ) then the cost of the ride would be so prohibitively expensive that no one would use the service

People seem to have this mythical belief that uber can pay every driver to drive a brand new car, at 100/hr, providing the best service for every customer every time all for 1/2 the price of a taxi

It simply not economically possible

Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by shagie on Monday April 05, 2021 @11:11PM (#26707592)
However, that is how regular taxi services work... and they're profitable. They don't ignore the ADA. They allow service animals. They help with wheelchairs and storing them appropriately - even if that requires more time for the driver. That extra cost of service is spread out across all customers and its a non-issue.

Uber's business model of trying to disrupt the taxi service by ignoring regulations is at issue here. With the ADA, they've encountered an issue that the court is not letting them ignore.

Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by syshum on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @10:16AM (#26712016)
>>However, that is how regular taxi services work... and they're profitable.

That really depends on the location, and many are not profitable and in some area many only service some parts of the town / city.

Sure if you are in a large city like NYC, LA, Chicago etc, then it would be different but if you start getting out of the top 50 cities the profitability starts to drop

Also clearly taxi's are not providing the service at the value demanded of users or Uber would not exist

Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by HWR_14 on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @01:44AM (#26708304)
If Uber cannot afford to pay their drivers minimum wage, they should raise more money and operate at a loss for longer or raise fares or shut down. Any of those three solutions seem to work. And those are basic, there are others.
Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by lm28469 on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @10:06AM (#26725154)
Well yeah, if the service can't treat people decently and make a profit of course it should shut down ...
Re:Uber ordered to pay $1.1M to blind woman refused rides by syshum on Thursday April 08, 2021 @09:19AM (#26738345)
What if it treats 95% of of the population decently and makes a profit?

Anyone knows that getting to 80% is easy, getting from 80-90 is normally $$$$ and getting to 99.99999999999995% which is what the thread it about is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$