Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity
by TeMPOraL on Monday April 05, 2021 @04:42AM
(#26696647)
Nah, most of the time it's just a fancy infosec way of saying "it was likely ordinary criminals, or even some script kiddies, but it would be quite embarrassing to admit that".
Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity
by cutemonster on Monday April 05, 2021 @03:45PM
(#26703679)
Why don't they say "country"? Or just "nation"?
(Can it really be because "nation state" is more fancy?)
I can understand, though, why they don't say "state" -- maybe that'd sound as if a single state in the US had attacked
Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity
by peteretep on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @12:55AM
(#26708048)
I think this derives from “state-sponsored”. “The state” has a distinct meaning from country or nation which I think is important to capture too.
I think your point about confusion with constituent states is spot on though
Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity
by cutemonster on Tuesday April 06, 2021 @01:51PM
(#26715077)
Thanks! Aha, so "state" here refers to the people running the country?
Rather than the citizens / "all people living there", (or geographical area)
So, could be organizations indirectly paid by, just an example, Putin or the CCP. But who the people in Russia or China don't know about (and might not have supported). -- I'm not a native speaker (I guess you've noticed :-))
Nation state is not a fancy infosec way of saying country