Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity

Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity by lostlogin on Sunday April 04, 2021 @06:51PM (#26693522)

> replacing my USG with my existing home server

I like this idea too, but would prefer that the router was physically separated and before any hardware that was in the network.

Is this a pointless concern?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity by jefurii on Monday April 05, 2021 @01:40PM (#26702026)

If you have your router in a separate box then you won't have to take down your whole network if you have to restart your VM host.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity by vageli on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:25PM (#26693737)

It's hard to say whether or not the concern is pointless without knowing its basis. Why do you want it physically separated?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity by lostlogin on Sunday April 04, 2021 @11:53PM (#26695162)

I had assumed a setup which had several VMs, with one being a PFSense or similar to be less secure than a standalone firewall. Reading about the pros and cons leads me to conclude that security in a virtual setup is just fine.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Ubiquiti all but confirms breach response iniquity by neolog on Sunday April 04, 2021 @07:44PM (#26693842)

If your server is vulnerable to some threat, adding another barrier in front of it could help.

[ Parent | on HN ]