News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by SomewhatLikely on Saturday April 03, 2021 @07:29PM (#26685661)
Here's my honest feedback: I stopped reading after the author started driving into implementation details without explaining what the purpose of an e-graph is. We got the what, but not the why.
Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by lqqq on Saturday April 03, 2021 @11:24PM (#26686656)
Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by Jtsummers on Saturday April 03, 2021 @07:50PM (#26685781)
This isn't the first time the author has written about E-graphs and they provide several links at the top which get to the meaning of them.

The 'e' stands for 'equivalence'.

https://www.philipzucker.com/egraph-1/

https://www.philipzucker.com/egraph-2/

Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by philzook on Saturday April 03, 2021 @08:19PM (#26685926)
Yea, sorry. I appreciate the feedback. Exactly what Jtsummers said, this is not really a standalone post. I did a bit better motivating the egraph in the first post.
Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by hvocode on Sunday April 04, 2021 @01:31PM (#26691293)
I was able to dive right in and read it. I don’t think every blog post needs to be a standalone document. I’m always surprised at the whiny comments from HN readers like the one above: for a site that likes to act tech savvy, some folks on here are shockingly incapable of using a basic search engine to do their own background reading.
Re:A Simplified E-graph Implementation by philzook on Saturday April 03, 2021 @08:24PM (#26685938)
If I could predict the ones that will get traction on HN, I'd make sure to give them good intros. Oh well.