Re:Android's new Bluetooth stack rewrite (Gabeldorsh) is wri...
by eecc on Friday April 02, 2021 @01:51PM
(#26673860)
Fine, but you're rationalizing living with poor execution. I'm rationalizing with deep (perhaps goldplating) correctness.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Android's new Bluetooth stack rewrite (Gabeldorsh) is wri...
by azernik on Friday April 02, 2021 @09:14PM
(#26677583)
I'm not "rationalizing", and neither are you.
You're arguing that it's not enough to make a correct implementation, but that it's also important to break compatibility with incorrect implementations.
I'm arguing that a better implementation that is compatible with current protocols is strictly better than a better implementation that is not Bluetooth-compatible.
If you make a piece of hardware that is good (e.g. doesn't randomly crash and need to be rebooted by the kernel), why is it a bad thing for it to try to connect to some flaky BT headset?