News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Move Slow and Make Things by TeMPOraL on Friday April 02, 2021 @03:58AM (#26669782)
> It's possible "AI" may be just a pretext to sell mass-made junk and pretend it is adjusted to each individual.

It's also an internal distraction. They'd achieve something much closer to what they promise if they just threw some old-school regression analysis at the problem. But that's not cool these days, plus it's hard to relabel as AI even for the marketroids these days, and would involve actual work :).

This applies to many "AI companies" - so many want to either have easy process (throw data at some random Kaggle model and hope it sticks) or just a buzzword to bullshit investors with. Sometimes both.

Re:Move Slow and Make Things by marcosdumay on Friday April 02, 2021 @10:43AM (#26671801)
What problem is there to apply regression at? You get the measures, and make the cloths fit to those measures. If there is any measure missing, you can't just go and guess it, because you are not fitting a population.

Talk about distraction...

Re:Move Slow and Make Things by lupire on Friday April 02, 2021 @10:45AM (#26671817)
People probably have a measurable bias in self-measurement, on average.
Re:Move Slow and Make Things by lostcolony on Friday April 02, 2021 @12:51PM (#26673183)
Sure, but just like people's measures tend toward a distribution, an "on average" bias is still going to be distributed. Trying to throw statistics at it is still going to lead to off the rack style sizing, and NOT individually tailored clothes.
Re:Move Slow and Make Things by geoduck14 on Sunday April 04, 2021 @12:21AM (#26686858)
How about a neural network trained on thousands of fashion trends?

And by "neural network", I mean my brain.

And by "thousands of fashion trends ", I mean I look at people in the mall.

Re:Move Slow and Make Things by ampdepolymerase on Friday April 02, 2021 @03:07PM (#26674807)
Yes, see https://shoesize.me for how it is properly done.