Re:Pfizer 91% effective in updated data, protective against ...
by javagram on Friday April 02, 2021 @12:20AM
(#26668992)
> Sorry but I don't believe it.
> In the very beginning of the South African variant there was a report that it wouldn't protect against it and other variants. They're the most expensive vaccine and they want to keep selling their product.
> I just lost faith in anything. When politicians make a profit from a prolonged emergency situation they have no reason to shorten the pandemic period [. . .]
These two arguments you’re making contradict each other - the vaccine protection from the variant without an update shortens the pandemic period. An announcement that everyone needs to shelter in place while a new vaccine is developed is actually what would prolong it.
Also, you seem to be placing more trust in an early “news report” than a scientific study, which makes no sense.
> In the very beginning of the South African variant there was a report that it wouldn't protect against it and other variants. They're the most expensive vaccine and they want to keep selling their product.
> I just lost faith in anything. When politicians make a profit from a prolonged emergency situation they have no reason to shorten the pandemic period [. . .]
These two arguments you’re making contradict each other - the vaccine protection from the variant without an update shortens the pandemic period. An announcement that everyone needs to shelter in place while a new vaccine is developed is actually what would prolong it.
Also, you seem to be placing more trust in an early “news report” than a scientific study, which makes no sense.