Re:Filecoin Foundation Grants 50k FIL to the Internet Archive
by hinkley on Thursday April 01, 2021 @07:56PM
(#26667752)
And it's still not clear to me how you avoid the situation where a datacenter with 3 network connections masquerades as three different filecoin storage providers with a very similar set of files.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Filecoin Foundation Grants 50k FIL to the Internet Archive
by slimsag on Thursday April 01, 2021 @10:33PM
(#26668546)
I got curious and looked it up. I found this[0]:
> As the storage miner receives each piece of client data, they place it into a sector. Sectors are the fundamental units of storage in Filecoin, and can contain pieces from multiple deals and clients.
> Next, a process called sealing takes place. During sealing, the sector data is encoded through a sequence of graph and hashing processes to create a unique replica. The encoding process is designed to be slow and computationally heavy, making it difficult to spoof.
Re:Filecoin Foundation Grants 50k FIL to the Internet Archive
by ric2b on Saturday April 03, 2021 @07:39AM
(#26680192)
Oh, so it's secretly proof of work.
Re:Filecoin Foundation Grants 50k FIL to the Internet Archive
by wmf on Thursday April 01, 2021 @11:52PM
(#26668888)
I think it's worse than that; it looks like Filecoin's PoRep proves that multiple copies of the data are stored on the same server. I don't understand why this is useful.
Re:Filecoin Foundation Grants 50k FIL to the Internet Archive
by thebean11 on Friday April 02, 2021 @11:38AM
(#26672325)
There's no incentive to store multiple copies of the same data vs a single copy of multiple datas. It's a possible attack vector, for example you could store all of the copies of some data and then lose it, but there's no economic incentive to do so from what I understand.