Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by xtracto on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @10:24PM
(#26655964)
Exactly, that's one reason why government paid social health care is aligned with this: The government benefits from doing prevention programmes as it is cheaper than late treatment.
Germany had all kind of preventative help/medicine when I lived there.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by refurb on Thursday April 01, 2021 @07:16AM
(#26658967)
Why would a private insurer not have the same incentive? Collect full premiums, but overall lower costs with early detection and treatment?
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by mbg721 on Thursday April 01, 2021 @07:20AM
(#26658998)
The older and sicker patients tend to move from the private insurer's risk pool to the public one.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by refurb on Thursday April 01, 2021 @09:08AM
(#26659994)
Agreed. But there is still an incentive for private insurers to limit future costs.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by Gibbon1 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:03PM
(#26656178)
The US system hopes that people get untreatable stage 4 cancer and die quickly.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ...
by spaetzleesser on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:42PM
(#26656447)
Maybe the insurers. Hospitals prefer treating them in the most expensive way.
Iām happy my taxes go towards helping people get out of stage 1 than seeing people live their final days in stage 4.