News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by spaetzleesser on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:29PM (#26654577)
I think people are waiting too long. And hospitals are probably not unhappy with that. I bet there is way more money in late stage cancer treatments vs early stage.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by cced on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @08:12PM (#26655026)
When your system would rather make money from your treatment of stage 4 cancer than benefit from a healthy and cured stage 1 cancer survivor.

I’m happy my taxes go towards helping people get out of stage 1 than seeing people live their final days in stage 4.

Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by xtracto on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @10:24PM (#26655964)
Exactly, that's one reason why government paid social health care is aligned with this: The government benefits from doing prevention programmes as it is cheaper than late treatment.

Germany had all kind of preventative help/medicine when I lived there.

Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by refurb on Thursday April 01, 2021 @07:16AM (#26658967)
Why would a private insurer not have the same incentive? Collect full premiums, but overall lower costs with early detection and treatment?
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by mbg721 on Thursday April 01, 2021 @07:20AM (#26658998)
The older and sicker patients tend to move from the private insurer's risk pool to the public one.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by refurb on Thursday April 01, 2021 @09:08AM (#26659994)
Agreed. But there is still an incentive for private insurers to limit future costs.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by Gibbon1 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:03PM (#26656178)
The US system hopes that people get untreatable stage 4 cancer and die quickly.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by spaetzleesser on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:42PM (#26656447)
Maybe the insurers. Hospitals prefer treating them in the most expensive way.
Re:Jump in cancer diagnoses at 65 implies patients wait for ... by Gibbon1 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @11:59PM (#26656551)
Heard the Chair of the Department of Medicine at UCSF say they make most of their money on elective procedures.