SpaceX loses another Starship prototype as landing sequence fails

Re:SpaceX loses another Starship prototype as landing sequen... by perl4ever on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:12PM (#26654396)

I don't understand how the belly flop is even possible.

I'm far from a rocket scientist, but I thought that rockets were kind of like soda cans - very strong on the long axis, but not at all perpendicular to that.

If you make them strong in both directions, I wonder how that doesn't make them prohibitively heavy.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:SpaceX loses another Starship prototype as landing sequen... by nickik on Thursday April 01, 2021 @03:55AM (#26657734)

Well, sure that is generally what is the case. But of course the designer can design it as he likes depending on the situation.

Generally, of course this is more true when the stages are empty. If the tanks are pressurized, as they are during the whole flight, they actually become very stable in both directions.

Starship is specifically designed to survive a reentry (heating) into the atmosphere at an angle, just like the Spaceshuttle.

[ Parent | on HN ]