Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl...
by DrSiemer on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:03PM
(#26654294)
You are not paying, right? So you are the product. You are targeted with ads tailored to your viewing pattern; your data is what creates value.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl...
by xiphias2 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @07:21PM
(#26654485)
I am actually paying to get rid of advertisements, not to get rid of useful features. This will just get me to stick with my channel subscriptions, as the recommendations are already often better and better scams.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl...
by blihp on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @08:52PM
(#26655392)
Unfortunately even then Google doesn't view you as the customer in any substantial way. Advertisers have been, and continue to be, who they want to keep happy. The reality is that, in aggregate, most users are willing to take a fair amount of abuse as long as it's free.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl...
by xiphias2 on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @08:57PM
(#26655434)
It would have been an interesting experiment to show dislikes for premium users and see how many people pay for those feature, but I think that would have been too controversial compared to the ads that are accepted practice already.
Re:Testing a few new designs that don't show the public disl...
by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @08:14PM
(#26655048)
Cable television subscribers originally payed to get rid of ads. Then the channels realized they could get you to pay and watch ads. You will be monetized in every way possible.