News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by cle on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @07:33PM (#26641854)
This is what I do. I host a controller in AWS on an EC2 instance in my account. It works great.
Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by dijit on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @07:52PM (#26641987)
Out of interest, why wouldn't you host it on something like a raspberry pi?

Having your local network depend on an external network makes my old school sysadmin bones tingle for some reason.

Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by gregmac on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @08:46PM (#26642309)
The Ubiquiti controller is not needed for general operation, unless you're using a guest hotspot. Otherwise if it's offline you just lose ability to do configuration and it's data/stats logging.
Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by julianz on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @08:57PM (#26642376)
It's also needed if you want to have any control over SSID's such as enabling/disabling on a schedule, bandwidth limiting and so on.
Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by thrixton on Wednesday March 31, 2021 @12:34AM (#26643556)
Hah, that's a dream world where enabling/disabling SSID's ever worked properly.

They have a good UI, good hardware but the software seems half baked.

Originally with the switch to the "new settings", the schedules were switched between the AP's and the UDM, not sure about a dedicated cloud controller.

Great product, poor QA I think.

Re:Whistleblower: Ubiquiti Breach “Catastrophic” by cle on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @11:56PM (#26643357)
Laziness? I can just set it up with a couple of clicks and pay almost nothing (it runs on a t2).