Unsplash is being acquired by Getty Images

Re:Unsplash is being acquired by Getty Images by busymom0 on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @06:11PM (#26641227)

I don't see it as whining. These companies are in the business of providing photos for people to be able to use. If their TOS is so vague that one simply cannot use any photos without knowing what the TOS allows or not - then the core purpose of the company has failed.

If FB and others are to be used as an example, these TOS are written vague and broad on purpose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unsplash is being acquired by Getty Images by dannyw on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @10:36PM (#26642939)

We appreciate the feedback, and will discuss internally to see if we can make this clause more specific and objective.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Unsplash is being acquired by Getty Images by dbrgn on Thursday April 01, 2021 @08:30AM (#26659612)

Clauses like that are really really hard. CC has the NC clause, which is problematic because it may not be clear what consists of commercial use and what doesn't. If a non-profit uses a picture for a fundraiser, is that commercial or not?

The thing that one of the parent comments suggested would actually be quite cool: An alternative license where the "applicants" could ask for permission to use a picture, stating how they will use it. If the author accepts (using a 1-button click), a license will automatically be granted. Everything would still remain free though. And certain use-cases could be allowed automatically (e.g. "personal use" or "use for a non-profit").

It would remove ambiguities (because an explicit permission is granted), but everyting would still remain royalty-free. Plus, the authors would learn how their photos are being used. (I'm happy to give out photos for free, but I'm also happy if people tell me where they're being used.)

[ Parent | on HN ]