News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded... by Dylan16807 on Monday March 29, 2021 @06:24PM (#26629046)
1. We're not talking about what's reasonable, but what's expected.

2. This isn't like a monopoly on water supply, because the ships don't have to go this way. To make the analogy work you'd have to add something like "everybody already has a well, but supplying tap water is cheaper than using a well". In such a situation, a water company that's maximizing profits would charge just a little bit less than using a well, and while it would annoy people it wouldn't harm them.

3. The government stops water companies from gouging for the good of the citizens, which isn't a factor here.

Re:Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded... by wizzwizz4 on Monday March 29, 2021 @06:51PM (#26629316)
Everybody has access to rainwater, except the people who don't. I think the analogy works quite well re point 2 (though not point 3).
Re:Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded... by Dylan16807 on Monday March 29, 2021 @07:27PM (#26629604)
We could argue about how fitting it is, but I'll just say this:

If we want to go with "everyone has suitable access to rainwater for important household use", then it changes the impact of the water company overcharging. It goes from despicable to mundane.

Re:Suez Canal says traffic in channel resumes after stranded... by perl4ever on Monday March 29, 2021 @10:27PM (#26630701)
In the US there are extensive laws about capturing rainwater, whether you can use rain barrels, etc. although it's no longer prohibited in any state.

https://rurallivingtoday.com/homesteading-today/is-it-illega...