This kind of of sweeping value judgement is sexist and totally inappropriate.

Where is he expecting to find all those under 26 year olds with no debt and a house? The median house in the US is almost 300k. Why do his goals for acceptable mate include must be in the 1%?

Who are these under-26 individuals who own a house to begin with, male or female?

Nah, take your views somewhere they’d be accepted, like not here. I saw your post and it isn’t acceptable.

It takes a few decades and milions $ to raise a family. It is perfectly valid to have a discussion how to find a good partner for startup or business. But not for this? No wonder most people will never have children.

> No wonder most people will never have children.

Yeah, I'm going to call BS on that claim.

That is correct, discussing how to find a romantic partner (especially in the terms you've used) is probably not going to be well received on this particular site.

Fair enough, but that doesn't change the fact that this is sexist. It's understandable that, exactly because of how you were raised, you might not completely understand that. But calling another human 'good' based on such rather shallow materialistic values is just showing a complete lack of respect, sorry.

"good woman to start family with" does not reflect general quality of person. 70 years old could be amazing person, but not great bride.