News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 19... by elzbardico on Monday March 29, 2021 @02:02AM (#26618149)
The public opinion is a court that almost never acquits and that only serves life-term sentences
Re:Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 19... by Veen on Monday March 29, 2021 @02:52AM (#26618419)
Yes, but secret trials don’t have a great history either. At its best, the media can prevent miscarriages of justice and make sure the government follows proper procedure.
Re:Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 19... by vidarh on Monday March 29, 2021 @05:28AM (#26619203)
There's a wide range between secret trials and not publishing peoples name in national media.

An approach used in many contexts is to make the information accessible but put limitations on publication whether permanently or only until a conviction is made, so that people with an interest in a case can investigate while recognising mistakes are made.

[another approach is various levels of barriers to make access inconvenient, e.g. forcing you to go to an office to look up records rather than making them easily searchable; or for tax information in Norway: the tax information is public, but unless you're media - who get a copy - your name will be accessible to the person you looked up]

Re:Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 19... by cafard on Monday March 29, 2021 @09:51AM (#26621521)
America collectively has a pretty short attention span.
Re:Robots.txt for the NYT has a specific exclusion for an 19... by orangeoxidation on Tuesday March 30, 2021 @05:49AM (#26632746)
That would be fair for radio or such.

In the internet age it can heavily damage or ruin things like your job and dating prospects permanently.