News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by jhbadger on Sunday March 28, 2021 @12:19PM (#26611555)
Caring for the elderly with a shortage of young people will be difficult (see Japan today). Which is one of the reasons Japan is so interested in robotics, although it is unclear when or if they really can replace nurses and assistants.
Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by Ancalagon on Sunday March 28, 2021 @12:54PM (#26611897)
To be honest I think being cared for by a robot would would be pretty dehumanizing.
Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by londons_explore on Sunday March 28, 2021 @01:22PM (#26612175)
A robot transports you (car). A robot decides your credit rating. A robot makes your clothes (weaving machine).

How is a robot wiping your backside any different?

Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by inglor_cz on Sunday March 28, 2021 @02:06PM (#26612614)
"A robot decides your credit rating."

That is already pretty dehumanizing. As are decisions of opaque Facebook and Google algorithms to demonetize / disable your account, with no obvious recourse to living human beings.

Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by nonameiguess on Sunday March 28, 2021 @02:47PM (#26613002)
What's dehumanizing is having your trustworthiness reduced to a single number at all, not the fact that it is done in a semi-automated manner.
Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by inglor_cz on Sunday March 28, 2021 @03:01PM (#26613136)
While I think your idea is substantiated, the semi-automated manner seems worse to me.

IDK why, but being submitted to robotic decisions wakes extreme resistance in me.

Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by innagadadavida on Sunday March 28, 2021 @01:29PM (#26612241)
This is a really poor excuse for bringing in a new life to existence - especially when there are so many better options like immigration.
Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by inglor_cz on Sunday March 28, 2021 @02:09PM (#26612646)
How is immigration a better solution?

Instead of a child, an adult must adapt to a very different culture. With lots of cultural clashes that are pretty obvious, especially in Europe, where a lot of the migrants come from the neighboring Islamic world with its very different social norms.

Not to mention that you rely on the fact that other nations do not stop reproducing. What if they do?

Countries like Bulgaria and Serbia have dropped into very low birthrates before becoming wealthy, thus they exist in the worst of worlds: educated and employable immigrants obviously choose places like England and Germany where they can make a lot more money, domestic youth migrates to the West too, leaving an old and vulnerable population without services.

Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by innagadadavida on Sunday March 28, 2021 @03:53PM (#26613756)
> an adult must adapt to a very different culture. With lots of cultural clashes…

Very true, but human beings can adapt. For example, all the Europeans that came to America 400-500 years ago are doing quite well today. The culture thing is just a red herring. All you are trying to do is maintain the status quo (nothing wrong with it).

Re:Most couples may have to use assisted reproduction by 2045 by WarOnPrivacy on Sunday March 28, 2021 @02:56PM (#26613084)
> How is immigration a better solution?

The impact on finite, planetary resources is less taxed by immigration (1+0) than by birth (1+1).