Re:Equivalent of 97% of Scotland’s 2020 electricity consumpt...
by bluefirebrand on Friday March 26, 2021 @10:17AM
(#26592429)
Agree, I'm missing some context to see why your parent post thought this was good enough. I suspect that "Lowest Demand" is being thought of in two different ways.
Re:Equivalent of 97% of Scotland’s 2020 electricity consumpt...
by eldaisfish on Friday March 26, 2021 @10:39AM
(#26592695)
even at the lowest demand, a large, grid-connected battery can only provide minutes of back up power, and that too for only a fraction of already low demand.
A storage battery is not a viable means of balancing demand and supply over a time period longer than minutes.
What's needed is not more batteries but better transmission, more hydro where possible and where hydro is not possible, more nuclear.
Re:Equivalent of 97% of Scotland’s 2020 electricity consumpt...
by bluefirebrand on Friday March 26, 2021 @10:49AM
(#26592823)
When you're talking about lowest demand are you talking about for the whole grid? A city block? A building? A condo?
And I agree. I worked in solar and storage for a while. It's not a replacement, it's just an extension.
It works out ok for a battery system for a building but anything larger they just don't last long enough
Re:Equivalent of 97% of Scotland’s 2020 electricity consumpt...
by eldaisfish on Friday March 26, 2021 @10:56AM
(#26592906)
Only the south australian grid, which is not a relatively large grid.
South Australia's population is small, under two million and it's demand fluctuates between 400 - 3000 MW. For comparison, the Canadian province of New Brunswick has a comparable peak demand but fewer than a million people.
Assuming lowest demand is at night, that means that building just 3 more batteries you could power the whole state for an hour at night?