News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court expands meaning of 'seizure' under 4th Amendment. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court expands meaning of 'seizure' under 4th Amen... by cgriswald on Friday March 26, 2021 @02:15AM (#26589240)
I agree that the judge overstepped. The SCOTUS didn’t. They can say whatever they want in their decision but if a judge can say that jury nullification is invalid and the conviction is still upheld it means a judge can say that jury nullification is invalid.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court expands meaning of 'seizure' under 4th Amen... by FpUser on Friday March 26, 2021 @08:04AM (#26591049)
>"conviction is still upheld"

There was no nullification in that particular case. If there was judge can say whatever s/he wants but there would be no conviction.

[ Parent | on HN ]