News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SQLite is not a toy database by nijave on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:39PM (#26584482)
I think the biggest issue can be distilled to "lack of concurrent network access". You start getting into a lot hairy management problems with distributed file systems/copying files around.

Imo part of that is just web applications tend to be not very efficient when compared to something like unix cli utilities so to get performance you end up with potentially massive amounts of horizontal scaling

On the other hand, the lack of performance /usually/ buys you higher productivity so you can make product changes faster (you let a GC manage the memory to save time coding but introduce GC overhead)

Re:SQLite is not a toy database by lmm on Thursday March 25, 2021 @10:45PM (#26588278)
> Imo part of that is just web applications tend to be not very efficient when compared to something like unix cli utilities so to get performance you end up with potentially massive amounts of horizontal scaling

It's less about performance than about resilience IMO. Of course if you don't have a proper HA datastore (master-master) then you kind of undermine that, but a datastore SPOF is better than the whole application being a SPOF.

Re:SQLite is not a toy database by therealdrag0 on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:57PM (#26584658)
Right, and Expensify plausibly solved this by wrapping SQLite to produce a different DB, BedrockDb. But that shouldn't imply at all that SQLite alone could satisfy main stream web applications.