News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RIP Google Reader by atmosx on Thursday March 25, 2021 @01:01PM (#26582663)
... so everything consolidated in G+?
Re:RIP Google Reader by llarsson on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:29PM (#26584386)
I still remember being swept away by Google Wave. Such a cool idea at the time, I thought.

That was such a good idea compared to Google Plus. Your content, your comments, just aggregated.

They could have pulled it off, too, I am sure. They just didn't want to.

Re:RIP Google Reader by cheschire on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:37PM (#26584458)
Maybe I'm just remembering poorly, but Wave seemed super buggy and laggy to me at the time.
Re:RIP Google Reader by kybernetikos on Thursday March 25, 2021 @04:16PM (#26584841)
We used it for architectural discussions and exploring ideas. I'd be hard pressed to think of something that was better for that.
Re:RIP Google Reader by skinkestek on Friday March 26, 2021 @07:51AM (#26590952)
For some reason I never saw it working.

Does anyone have a link to a video of it actually being in use?

Re:RIP Google Reader by henhouse on Friday March 26, 2021 @06:34PM (#26597830)
Re:RIP Google Reader by edoceo on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:54PM (#26584624)
It was crappy but it's intention was good.
Re:RIP Google Reader by eythian on Friday March 26, 2021 @08:12AM (#26591112)
It wasn't the fastest, but I think that now browser (and CPU) tech has moved on since then, it'd probably be a lot smoother. I remember using it once to coordinate specs on a small contract job and it worked pretty well for that.
Re:RIP Google Reader by atmosx on Friday March 26, 2021 @07:35AM (#26590841)
I liked wave a lot as well.
Re:RIP Google Reader by macintux on Thursday March 25, 2021 @01:23PM (#26582918)
Certainly that was Google's intention. Thank goodness they failed.
Re:RIP Google Reader by pantalaimon on Thursday March 25, 2021 @01:46PM (#26583217)
But they didn't even try very hard. G+ didn't event have a way to create events. Google Calendar was on every Android device, it would have been so seamless if you could have create a birthday party or attend a rave in the park and it would be right in your calendar.

But no, you could only post stories and pictures. That made for a rather bare-bones social network.

Re:RIP Google Reader by Godel_unicode on Thursday March 25, 2021 @02:44PM (#26583844)
This is a great illustration of the problem G+ had; events in g+ were amazing but nobody (apparently) knew. Setting them up was easy, inviting people was easy, privacy for events made sense from the UI, etc. If you set things up correctly, everyone who was invited would have a shared photo album that they would be able to share pictures to with one click.

I have a friend who had an amazing wedding photo album created this way; to this day they swear that if it had been marketed better g+ events would have put wedding photographers out of business...

Re:RIP Google Reader by olliej on Thursday March 25, 2021 @08:21PM (#26587424)
Did people have to have G+ accounts to receive invites? I know Facebook requires it, but if they just used standard calendaring events (maybe with an info link to g+?) that would seem a winner
Re:RIP Google Reader by pantalaimon on Thursday March 25, 2021 @03:16PM (#26584219)
Maybe they added it later? When it launched there was no such feature, I think they added events after a year or so, but by then all the hype had already died down.
Re:RIP Google Reader by Andrew_nenakhov on Thursday March 25, 2021 @02:09PM (#26583460)
First iteration was rather nice, clean interface without many distractions. However, then they got all cardy with that material design, and it all was very confusing
Re:RIP Google Reader by waheoo on Thursday March 25, 2021 @10:43PM (#26588268)
I swear material design was the result of one too many post-it note sessions.
Re:RIP Google Reader by eythian on Friday March 26, 2021 @08:14AM (#26591127)
G+ had events, I used to use them all the time. And then they removed them from communities, which was a large portion of how people (in my circles at least) used them. So that made it a lot less useful.