Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by mullingitover on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @09:22PM
(#26575467)
This is the definition if a win-win then, because I would take a pay cut to keep working from home (not planning to mention this in salary negotiations). I definitely don't feel like I'm being exploited by saving my company a few bucks and saving irreplaceable moments of my life that I'd waste commuting. The lack of commute is the real kicker, driving to work costs me money, and it's a life-endangering activity.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by tayo42 on Thursday March 25, 2021 @02:57AM
(#26577211)
> saving my company a few bucks and saving irreplaceable moments of my life that I'd waste commuting.
I bet if you actually considered the commute as part of your paid time to calculate an hourly rate, a lot of people probably come ahead when switching to wfh despite "renting their space" or whatever.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by asdff on Thursday March 25, 2021 @01:44PM
(#26583185)
Depends on how you commuted to work. If you biked to work you just lost your cardio gym membership baked into your day.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by randomdude402 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:28PM
(#26575892)
This is it. I actually took a small pay cut this year to work for a company that is guaranteed remote friendly.
The peace of mind knowing that these guys already had remote engineers before the pandemic and a good workflow, and having a job that is officially and permanently remote is absolutely worth a few thousand bucks to me.
I was dreading going back to the office, even if only a day or two a week.
Counting the commute I would have otherwise been going back to with my previous company that was super excited to get asses back in seats, I'm probably actually getting paid more per hour of my time dedicated to work activities.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by UnpossibleJim on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:43PM
(#26575971)
I always looked at the commute cost as a balance out, TBH. The distractions on the bus made study on the bus difficult and I wouldn't work on there because I was loathe to be one of the people edging out another with a laptop on a full bus. granted, other places may have better transport than the Seattle area (ours is pretty notorious), but most is pretty crowded and not suited for work or leisure. I count those commute hours as personal cost hours, to me and the environment. It was an hour in and an hour out (on a really good day), and I'm like 20 miles from the city center.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by lmm on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:21PM
(#26575850)
Were you making more than $0 off that space before? Not everything is zero-sum.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by asdff on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @11:41PM
(#26576360)
No, but presumably they got some living utility out of that space previously that is now devoted to work. Maybe you can finally take up mountain biking now that you don't have to make space for a desk you don't use after 5pm on friday and can fit the equipment.
Re:Silicon Valley firms in no hurry to open up offices despi...
by lmm on Thursday March 25, 2021 @07:36PM
(#26587032)
The person I replied to was explicitly talking about people who already have a desktop computer setup at home. I guess for a few of them that desktop might be used by a partner or children during the day, but in the vast majority of cases it would sit idle.
Sure, but it's your personal desktop computing arrangement -- not the company's.
With WFH, the company is effectively renting that space from you so you can work in it, but you're charging them $0.