News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by loceng on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @07:37PM (#26561747)
If this is ahead of schedule it makes me wonder if they're dumping risk from the recent GME et al fiasco onto the public market - or they're fast tracking it because they need more billions to cover unexpected costs due to GME et al?
Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by CapriciousCptl on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @09:10PM (#26562374)
My bet is the latter. GME exposed how undercapitalized they were given their customers’ leverage and existing investors probably aren’t interested in/can’t agree on terms for injecting more cash themselves.

Probably, you wouldn’t intentionally IPO immediately after a PR disaster unless you had too.

I really really hope the SEC makes them disclose all the gory details of their “payment for order flow” stuff. I mean, basically, smart people who write about it (Levine, patio11), say it’s harmless/helpful. But I don’t think it sits right with anyone. Certainly not with me .

Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by freeone3000 on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @01:13AM (#26563847)
Short story is, they're making money you don't have access to. Exchanges add fees to every trade that goes through an exchange. If a stock costs $10 with a $1 fee, and someone's willing to sell it to you for $10.50 with a $0 fee, wouldn't you take it? That's fifty cents of price improvement over national best offer. So Citadel batches all the orders for that stock and does one big trade (per stock) at the end of the day, and everything settles out -- you got cheaper stock, they made some money for their trouble. Enough money to kick back $0.20 or so to Robinhood for referring you as a client.
Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by basseq on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @11:51AM (#26568791)
> GME exposed how undercapitalized they were...

Or, more accurately, the extreme volatility of GME led to increased collateral requirements that Robinhood couldn't meet. (It was like billions of dollars, iirc.) Or, otherwise, it's not that Robinhood was undercapitalized (or even is undercapitalized!)—just that the goalposts moved suddenly and unexpectedly.

PFOF is still a little squirrel-y. Ditto on Levine and others, and tied up in all that T+2 settlement issue, too.

Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by CapriciousCptl on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @05:01PM (#26572857)
I think most people would equate "not meeting collateral requirements" to being undercapitalized.
Re:Robinhood is said to have filed confidentially for U.S. IPO by vmception on Tuesday March 23, 2021 @07:46PM (#26561806)
Although it almost never is the specific purpose, it is always also a purpose.

An exit is an exit, a liquidity event is a liquidity event.

De-risking means being able to support your lifestyle no matter what happens, so this does that regardless of whatever quantum states of adversity could lurk behind the scenes.