Re:In January, there were more real-estate agents than homes...
by ineptech on Monday March 22, 2021 @06:53PM
(#26548508)
It sounds like you've never been a landlord. For small-timers at any rate, the main attraction is asset appreciation, and the second is tax subsidies. Excess rent is usually the least important factor, and is often around zero, and can even be negative.
Re:In January, there were more real-estate agents than homes...
by o-__-o on Monday March 22, 2021 @07:57PM
(#26549168)
My parents bought a house when I was a kid. They struggled through bad tenants but were able to stay afloat when rent was not coming in. Fast forward 30 years, the house is literally free money for my semi-retired mom. The house rent pays for taxes and repairs and gives my mum excess money for the month.
Re:In January, there were more real-estate agents than homes...
by whimsicalism on Monday March 22, 2021 @06:04PM
(#26547908)
I don't think the typical landlord is paying more on maintenance per month than they are gaining from rent. Taxes are paid net of maintenance costs.
Re:In January, there were more real-estate agents than homes...
by testesttest on Monday March 22, 2021 @06:48PM
(#26548448)
> You get taxed on it according to your highest rate bracket.
Why would you personally own the property as opposed to putting it under an LLC or Corp? You would still have to pay taxes on personal income but it offers a lot more options on how to recieve the income and handle expenses.
Oh yeah, one of the towns where I have property just pulled a new rental regulation out of thin air requiring a notification filing and fee for each rental property per year or on each new tennant lease. This country is turning into regulation hell.